For decades, investment research followed a familiar path.
Today’s investors still value informed analysis, expert judgement and credible market perspectives. Behind that content are research analysts, strategists and investment specialists within securities brokerage firms, producing equity research, market commentary, investment views and other insights that support brokers and their clients. What has changed is how those insights are discovered, distributed, consumed and acted upon. The challenge is increasingly not the quality or quantity of research being produced, but how effectively firms can connect that expertise with the brokers and investors for whom it is most relevant, at the moment it matters.
Research now competes with market alerts, videos, podcasts, social feeds, portfolio dashboards and AI-generated summaries. It is consumed during a commute or while checking a mobile portfolio application. Often, the first interaction with an investment idea is not a 30-page report. It is a headline, chart, two-minute video or personalised notification.
The investor journey has become digital and hybrid
The shift towards digital advice and virtual engagement has been building for several years. The preference was even higher among Gen Z and millennials, at 61% for both groups. For securities brokerage firms, that changes the role of research distribution. Digital channels can surface an investment idea or market insight, while brokers provide the context, judgement and guidance clients need to understand what it means for them.
Short-form content is an entry point, not a substitute
The rise of shorter content is sometimes treated as evidence that attention spans have collapsed. Investors will still engage deeply with subjects that affect their portfolios, families or long-term plans. But they need a reason to invest that time.
A concise investment note can quickly explain why a market event matters. A well-designed chart can bring a complex insight to life, and a short summary can help a broker or adviser decide whether to dive deeper into the full research. The goal isn't to reduce valuable analysis but to make it more accessible, so the right insights are easier to find, understand and put into action.
- a mobile executive summary;
- a chart-led LinkedIn post;
- a broker or adviser briefing;
- a short client email;
- a two-minute video;
- the original long-form report;
- an interactive webpage;
Video makes expertise easier to access
Investment research is often complex because markets are complex. But complexity does not always need to be communicated through dense text. Video gives research analysts, strategists and investment specialists a way to explain the judgement behind a conclusion.
Tone, emphasis and visual context can make an argument more understandable without making it less rigorous. A short video can answer a focused question:
What changed in the analyst's outlook on this company or sector?
What should investors understand about current credit spreads?
How could a policy decision affect portfolio positioning?
Each format should have a clear purpose. A short video can introduce a market theme, a chart can highlight the key insight, and a detailed report can provide the supporting analysis.
Together, they create a more natural research journey, helping clients quickly grasp the headline before exploring the detail, with brokers adding context where it matters most.
Audio creates space for nuance
Where video is effective for visual explanation and rapid attention, podcasts and audio briefings allow more room for discussion. They are well suited to investment debates, portfolio-manager conversations and interviews with specialists. For securities brokerage firms, audio can reveal more of the thinking behind the research. Listeners hear uncertainty, competing interpretations and the reasoning that led to a conclusion. That can build credibility, particularly when the subject does not have a simple answer. However, a podcast should not become a recording of a written report. It needs a clear editorial purpose. Useful formats include:
1. A weekly five-minute market briefing
2. A discussion between an analyst and portfolio manager
3. A broker-focused briefing on a market theme of investment product
4. A client question-and-answer episode
5. A debate presenting different investment scenarios
Personalisation determines relevance
The biggest shift isn't from text to video or desktop to mobile, but it's from mass distribution to relevant distribution. Investors don't want every piece of research a firm publishes; they want the insights that matter to their portfolios and decisions. Effective personalisation isn't about creating new investment advice for every client. It can start with using client characteristics, portfolio context, interests and engagement signals to make approved research and investment insights easier to discover by the audiences for whom they are relevant. For brokers, that can mean spending less time searching through research and more time identifying the insights most relevant to upcoming client conversations.
Research engagement can also provide signals of investor intent. A client who repeatedly engages with research on a security or sector, views the relevant instrument in a trading app, checks a quote or adds it to a watchlist may be demonstrating stronger interest than someone who simply opens an email. Connecting these signals can help firms understand how research contributes to the wider investment journey without assuming that content directly caused a trade.
Research distribution can also work in the opposite direction. When a client engages repeatedly with a particular security, sector or investment theme, those behavioural signals can help brokers identify emerging interests and determine where a relevant follow-up may be appropriate.
AI will change the research workflow
Generative AI is beginning to change how broker-dealers work with information and research. FINRA has identified potential applications including analysing and synthesising financial and market data, summarising complex documents and research reports, and extracting issuer-specific information from SEC filings and earnings calls. For securities brokerage firms, the opportunity extends beyond producing research.
AI can help make existing research easier to classify, discover, summarise and activate across broker and client workflows.It can also help firms understand what happens after publication.
Which themes generate adviser conversations?
Which charts are revisited?
Which clients engage with a topic before changing their allocation?
Which research are brokers themselves consuming and sharing?
Which insights lead to client conversations or follow-up?
And which topics repeatedly generate engagement across particular client segments?
This is the strategic shift. The question is no longer only: What research should we produce?
It is also: Who needs this insight? In what format? At what moment? Through which channel? What should happen next?
Therefore, research is not dead.The static, one-format distribution model is simply losing relevance.
Dominic Gamble
CEO and Co-founder, Upscale
What financial institutions should review
| Area | Question to ask |
|---|---|
| Mobile | Can clients understand the central insight without opening a desktop PDF? |
| Short-form | Does each major report have a clear summary, chart and adviser-ready takeaway? |
| Video | Are experts visible and able to explain ideas clearly? |
| Audio | Are there subjects that would benefit from discussion rather than compression? |
| Personalisation | Is research distributed according to relevance, or only broad client segments? |
| Measurement | Can the firm connect research engagement to broker activity, client conversations and downstream outcomes? |
| AI | Are AI tools governed, explainable and integrated into existing approval processes? |
| Broker enablement | Can brokers quickly identify the research most relevant to their clients and upcoming conversations? |
| Governance | Can approved research be activated across channels while maintaining appropriate supervision, disclosures and controls? |
Subscribe to our newsletter
A monthly or so newsletter that sums up all our news, tips, insights and observations from the world of sales engagement in the wealth management eco-system.
FAQ
Is long-form investment research becoming obsolete?
No. Detailed research remains important for evidence, methodology and informed decision-making. Its role is changing, however. Investors increasingly encounter shorter or more visual formats before choosing whether to explore the full report.
How can firms personalise research without creating excessive content?
By modularising approved research and using appropriate client, portfolio and engagement data to help brokers and clients discover relevant insights, without requiring the firm to create an entirely new piece of research for every audience.
Should securities brokerage firms prioritise video over written research?
The formats should work together. Video can make an argument accessible and human, while written research provides depth, precision and a permanent reference point.
How can firms personalise research without creating excessive content?
By modularising approved research and using appropriate client, portfolio and engagement data to help brokers and clients discover relevant insights, without requiring the firm to create an entirely new piece of research for every audience.
How can securities brokerage firms distribute research across more channels without creating additional compliance risk?
Firms need workflows that preserve appropriate approvals, disclosures and controls as approved research is adapted for different channels and audiences. Technology can make that process more scalable, but it should operate within the firm's existing supervisory framework.
What role should AI play?
AI can support summarisation, tagging, distribution, analytics and content adaptation. Investment judgement, compliance oversight and client suitability should remain under human control.
How should research engagement be measured?
Useful measures include reading time, repeat visits, adviser sharing, topic-level engagement,, follow-up requests and the relationship between content interaction and client decisions.
